Workflows that run, not just diagrams.

We build automation with n8n and language models that runs in production and that your team can monitor and adjust.

The situation

Many automation projects don't fail on the idea, they fail on execution: workflows that work in testing but break on real data, have no error handling, or that nobody in the company understands or can maintain.

n8n is an open, self-hostable automation tool with very broad connectivity to existing systems. Combined with language models, it can handle processes that used to be too unstructured for classic automation: sorting email, evaluating documents, creating and reviewing content, multi-step approval processes.

We build these workflows with error handling, logging, and a structure your team understands, instead of a chain of nodes only we can maintain.

Deliverables

  • Process analysis

    Clarification of which steps can be automated and where a human should keep the decision.

  • Workflow architecture

    A structure of several traceable n8n workflows instead of one confusing monolithic workflow.

  • LLM integration

    Connection of language models for the steps that need to understand, classify, or generate text.

  • Error handling and monitoring

    Notification on errors and traceability of what a workflow did and when.

  • Handover and training

    Documentation of the workflows and a briefing so your team can adjust them on its own.

Our approach

  • 01

    Capture the process

    We document the existing process with the people and systems involved.

  • 02

    Design the workflow

    We design the workflow structure, including where a language model is used.

  • 03

    Build and test

    We build the workflows in n8n and test them with real, not just sample, data.

  • 04

    Put into operation

    We activate the workflows in production, with error handling and notifications.

  • 05

    Hand over

    We hand over documentation and access and train your team in maintenance and extension.

Typical starting points

A manual, recurring task ties up capacity

Solution: An automated workflow with clear error handling

Existing automation is unstable or hard to understand

Solution: A rebuild with a documented, maintainable structure

A task requires understanding text, not just fixed rules

Solution: A workflow with an LLM step for classification or text generation

Outside our scope

We don't build workflows without error handling, and we don't leave without training someone in the company who understands them. For use cases where a language model is too unreliable, we say so and suggest classic rule-based automation instead.

Frequently asked questions

EdTech company, content production

Ausgangslage

Content production ran step by step by hand and depended on a few people.

Umsetzung

n8n pipeline with LLM steps for drafting, structuring, and formatting, with human sign-off.

Ergebnis

The content team works on quality, not on mechanical intermediate steps.

EdTech company, customer service

Ausgangslage

Customer service answered recurring questions manually from scattered knowledge.

Umsetzung

AI agent with access to the knowledge base, with clear escalation to humans.

Ergebnis

Recurring inquiries run productively through the agent, complex cases stay with the team.

EdTech company, PE-financed

Ausgangslage

PE-financed EdTech company, technical picture unclear before the investment.

Umsetzung

Tech DD, greenfield architecture, AI agents in production, AI-assisted engineering organization.

Ergebnis

The company runs AI in day-to-day operations, not just in pilot projects.

Initial call: 30 minutes, concrete.

We look at a concrete process and tell you whether and how it can be automated.