Real estate platform, Berlin
Tech Due Diligence for a Real Estate Platform in Berlin
Before a decision, the parties involved needed an independent technical picture of the platform.
| Industry | Real Estate |
|---|---|
| Services | Technical Due Diligence |
Situation
A real estate platform based in Berlin faced a decision that needed an independent technical assessment: how viable is the existing architecture, how high is the risk, and what would an expansion cost.
Task
As advisors, we were to independently assess the platform's technology and derive a target software architecture from it, a way forward rather than just a list of risks.
Implementation
Tech DD report
Assessment of architecture, team, and technical risk for the decision-makers.
Risk picture
Concrete classification of which risks are real and which are negligible.
Target software architecture
Proposal for the architecture the platform should move toward.
Recommended actions
Prioritized next steps for implementation.
Approach
The assessment followed the usual DD process: architecture, code, team, and processes were checked systematically, not by spot sampling. Results were presented directly to the decision-makers, with a clear line between what was evidenced and what remained an assessment.
A target architecture was derived directly from the findings, so the report was not just a diagnosis but a foundation for the next decision.
Result
The decision-makers had a documented, independent picture of the technical risk before their decision, and a concrete target architecture as the next step, not just an opinion.
Transferable lessons
DD belongs before the decision
Its value drops the later it comes in the process.
A risk report alone is not enough
Only with a target architecture does the diagnosis become a plan.
Separate evidence from assessment
Decision-makers need both, but kept clearly apart.
First conversation: 30 minutes, concrete.
We talk about the scope of a technical due diligence for your situation.